The Word From Arizona's Fifth District

Tuesday, July 25, 2006

Tuesday News Update

Mike from Blog for Arizona has a great piece on the money trails between Abramoff and Hayworth. Check it out and see how Hayworth and his wife have been living off of PAC contributions funneled by Abramoff.

AZCongressWatch has the round-up on all the latest campaign news.

Craig at Random Musings is now on J.D.'s radar. He was cited in Hayworth's latest lame press release attacking Mitchell for being for universal health care. Craig's blog doesn't really go into any details on Mitchell's plan, but it's nice to know we actually have a candidate who cares about the thousands of Arizonans without health coverage.

Mitchell Wins Arizona Police Association Endorsement!

The Arizona Police Association, representing nearly 7,000 officers across the state, has endorsed Harry Mitchell. This is great news for Harry and will really carry some clout in this leans-Republican district.

From the APA's letter to Mitchell:

"It is our belief that you will bring the character and dedication necessary to improve the community and promote the ideals of effective law enforcement held by our members. We remember and appreciate all that you did for the men and women of the Tempe Officers Association."

"I'm very proud and humbled to have the support of our police officers," said Mitchell. "I've always made public safety a top priority, and I'm proud of my record of working with our law enforcement officers to make our neighborhoods safer."

You can view Harry's press release here.

Friday, July 21, 2006

Weekend Open Thread

The weekend officially begins for me in one hour, but before then, one thing.

cmpaz over at Random Musings has the scoop on last night's LD-8 candidate forum. Harry Mitchell was a guest and spent some time answering questions. Must read article by cpmaz!

What are you doing to beat the heat this weekend? Staying inside comfortably in front of your computer? Going up north (or south, it's cooler down there, too)?

Thursday, July 20, 2006

Thursday Afternoon Update

I wanted to post this editorial from the Arizona Republic about Hayworth and his war against the New York Times. All the news that Rep. J.D. Hayworth deems to print. Good read.

cpmaz has the run-down on a LD-8 meeting tonight with Harry Mitchell and more candidates for the state legislature.

AZCongressWatch wraps up yesterdays's CD-5 news. J.D. Hayworth has been endorsed by the National Federation of Independent Business. No surprise there. And Harry Mitchell points out Ralph Reed's loss in the primary for Lt. Governor of Georgia. A sign that corruption is not the dead issue many have come to believe.

Wednesday, July 19, 2006

The Stem Cell Veto and Hayworth

The House of Representatives took up Bush's veto of the Stem Cell Research Enhancement Bill. As expected, the veto override failed, more than fifty votes short. cpmaz has been covering this over at Random Musings.

Take a look at the Roll Call vote. Notice a familiar Republican Arizona name amongst the Nay votes? Well, you would recognize five of them, as Kolbe was the only Republican to vote for the bill.

But only one name interests me: J.D. Hayworth.

AZ-05 is not a socially conservative district. Scottsdale, while heavily Republican, isn't a stronghold of religious radicals or evangelicals. If only some polling on stem cell research was done here in Arizona. I would expect overwhelming support! The scientific potential almost can't be measured.

So what's your excuse, J.D.? The blastocysts need your protection? Why don't you use your time to protect real people? What's your excuse?

"Conservatives want more live babies to make more dead soldiers."
-George Carlin

Hayworth Accuses Mitchell of Discrimination

I'm sure most people have seen Hayworth's latest press release. In it, J.D. calls on Mitchell to apologize for past discrimination by the city of Tempe when Harry was mayor.

I only lived in Tempe while at the dorms at ASU. I didn't grow up there and I am not well versed in Tempe history or city politics. I hope to see more blogging about what Hayworth is accusing Mitchell of and I predict long nights of researching for me.

Right now, though, I have one point:

Where the hell does J.D. get off accusing Harry Mitchell of discrimination against Hispanics?

What does J.D. think his immigration stances are? Gift-baskets for Hispanic workers and families? No, they are hate-filled and full of angry rhetoric based on skin color and a devotion to Henry Ford's ridiculous philosophies.

Want to see someone who is anti-Hispanic? Look in the damn mirror, J.D.

Tuesday, July 18, 2006

Americanization: Hayworth's Creed

I have to blog this before being done tonight.

From The Huffington Post :

"Americanization," Henry Ford, The Fascist Right And Arizona Republican Clod, Crook, & "Author," J.D. Hayworth
by Howie Klein

I don't know a lot about Harry Mitchell yet, other than he's the Arizona Democrat candidate challenging the crooked incumbent lunatic J.D Hayworth. If I lived in Tempe, Scottsdale or Phoenix's northeast suburbs I wouldn't hesitate for a mmoment to vote for Mitchell. Hayworth is a cut below your garden variety corrupt Republican rubber stamp, a true monstrosity and one of the most corrupt of the lot, purchased long ago by Jack Abramoff for something like $150,000, so not just a dirty whore, but a bargain basement dirty whore.

Beloved by right-wing propaganda agents like O'Reilly, Ingraham and Hannity (who "wrote" the intro to Hayworth's xenophobic book, WHATEVER IT TAKES), Hayworth defines rubber stamp Republican, although when Bush's ratings began to tank, he was the very first rat to desert the sinking ship, publicly telling his fearless leader to please stay away from AZ-05. He and the little wife have a real self-enrichment racket going for themselves ala Mr and Mrs DeLay, Mr. or Mrs. Doolittle and other Republicrooks who hide behind their wives' skirts in their larceny or-- as in the case of Crazy Curt Weldon (R-PA), behind his daughters' skirt.

Neo-fascist publishing house, Regnery, put out Hayworth's ghost-written anti-immigrant screed a kind of love paean to actual (instead of "neo") Nazi, Henry Ford. The book is, more than anything else Hayworth's endorsement of Ford's so-called "Americanization," the 30's anti-Jew hysteria similar to exactly the same as Hayworth's anti-immigrant jihad today. Judge for yourself:

Henry Ford, a leader in [the Americanization] movement, said, "These men of many nations must be taught American ways, the English language, and the right way to live." Talk like that today and our liberal elites will brand you a cultural imperialist, or worse. But if you ask me, Ford had a better idea. Sadly, Americanization has given way to an insidious multiculturalism, the noxious idea that all cultures are equally valid and worthy... Henry Ford must be spinning in his grave.
-J.D. Hayworth in WHATEVER IT TAKES

Or check this out:

Over three decades ago, Nathan Glazer and Daniel Patrick Moynihan asked, "To what does one assimilate in modern America ?" In Henry Ford's day, we had a great big list of things. But if multiculturalism and diversity are valued above all else, the answer is you can assimilate however you want, or not at all.
-J.D. Hayworth in WHATEVER IT TAKES

Ford was a pro-Hitler, hate-spewing and raving anti-semite, one of the most anti-American plutocrats in the history of our nation, a disgrace to the country that nurtured his rise to unparalleled wealth. As J.D. Hayworth well knows Ford outlined his "Americanization" program in his best known work, THE INTERNATIONAL JEW. This is something that Hayworth never wants to talk about, at least not publicly where voters may discover what this racist shit-eater is really made of.

Indeed, it is such a statement as the Gentile mind could not have evolved, because the trend of Gentile feeling is all in the opposite direction, namely that Americanization is a good thing for the Jew. It is from authoritative Jewish sources we learn this fact, that what we call civilizing influences are looked upon as being at enmity with Judaism. It is not the Gentile who says that Jewish ideals, as ideals, are incompatible with the life of our country; it is the Jew who says so. It is he who inveighs against Americanism, not the American who inveighs against Judaism. Americanism is yet unfinished, Judaism has been complete for centuries. While no American would think of pointing to any part of the country or to any group as representing the true and final type of Americanism, the Jews quite unhesitatingly point to parts of the world and to certain groups as representing the true type of Judaism.

To "Americanize" means, in our ordinary speech, to bring into sympathy with the traditions and institutions of the United States, but the Jews do not mean only the United States when they say "America." They mean also South and Central America-- where so many revolutions have occurred. There are large numbers of Jews in Argentina, and many are found in other countries. It would probably give a wrong slant to the fact to say that the Jewish leaders are wholly anti-America, but it is true to say that they are against the "Americanization" of the Jewish immigrant stream. That is, that the trend of "Americanism" is so different from the trend of "Judaism" that the two are in conflict. This does not indicate treason toward American nationalisms perhaps, so much as it indicates loyalty toward Jewish nationalism.


-Henry Ford, "Jew Objection to Americanism"

And Ford made plenty of similarly xenophobic, racist and antisemitic outburts throughout THE INTERNATIONAL JEW, outburst that seem to have informed and inspired an adoring acolyte, Arizona's most clueless, hate-filled congressloon, J.D. Hayworth.

"One of the strongest causes militating against the full Americanization of several millions of Jews in this country is their belief-instilled in them by their religious authorities-that they are 'chosen,' that this land is theirs, that the inhabitants are idolators, that the day is coming when the Jews will be supreme."
-Henry Ford, "Jews and the 'Religious Persecution' Cry"

"Wherever Jewish tendencies are permitted to work unhindered, the result is not 'Americanization,' nor 'Anglicization' nor any other distinctive nationalism, but a strong and ruling reversion back to essential 'Judaization.'"
-Henry Ford, "Protocols Claim Partial Fulfillment"

A few days ago Arizona's Jewish News warned its readers about the dangers inherent in re-electing Hayworth. Like myself, they were shocked and worried about Hayworth's ringing endorsement of Ford and his "Americanization" scheme. "The ever-so-successful process that used to be called 'Americanization' was a major movement in the early 1900s ... Henry Ford, a leader in this movement, said, 'These men of many nations must be taught American ways, the English language, and the right way to live.' Talk like that today and our liberal elites will brand you a cultural imperialist, or worse. But if you ask me, Ford had a better idea." Hayworth's Jewish constituents don't think so. The Jewish News calls their congressman to task for not looking into it more carefully before publishing it.

Ford's belief in a Jewish world conspiracy led him to spread such bile, including "The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion," that the American Jewish Committee and the Anti-Defamation League finally negotiated an agreement with him that "articles reflecting on the Jews" would never again appear in the Dearborn Independent, a newspaper Ford owned. He claimed that he himself had been too busy to read the pieces that bore his name - a contention that Louis Marshall, chairman of the AJC at the time (and grandfather of Valley resident Jonathan Marshall), called "humiliating."

According to the AJHS site, Ford later claimed that his signature on the agreement with Marshall had been forged, and that Jewish bankers had caused World War II.

We're not saying that Hayworth is anti-Semitic - only that he should choose his heroes more carefully. One has only to listen to the broadcasts of Ford's friend and fellow Detroit resident Father Charles E. Coughlin to understand the ignorance at work in the kind of thinking Ford espoused. Or read the words of F.D.R.'s Secretary of the Interior, Harold L. Ickes, in response to news that Ford had received a medal from Adolf Hitler and refused to return it: "How can any American accept a decoration from the hand of a brutal dictator who, with that same hand, is robbing and torturing thousands of fellow human beings?"

Whatever it takes, J.D.? To that we say, with the accompanying dismissive hand gesture, "Whatever."

Let's keep in mind from whence J.D. Hayworth has chosen to draw his inspiration for his work and his bizarre mindset when it's time to go to the polls in November. And let's remember, that whatever it takes, retiring J.D. Hayworth is worth the effort.

Update: The Mitchell camp forwarded an editorial from a Jewish newspaper blasting Hayworth to AZCongressWatch. Sam Coppersmith over at Liberal Desert broke it earlier!

Rescue Me Night Open Thread

What do you do usually on Tuesday nights? Mine is devouted to watching Rescue Me. FX has the best original shows other than HBO, oh how I wish the FX shows could be on HBO. Think of it.

Also, today is Harry Mitchell's birthday. Lofty Donkey has a link where you can send Harry your best wishes.

The Hits Keep Coming From Mitchell Camp!

Hayworth Raises Money for Virginia Group Attacking McCain
Hayworth Supported Group Accuses McCain of "McCarthy-Like Behavior"

U.S. Rep. J.D. Hayworth is actively raising money for a Virginia-based organization that has accused U.S. Sen. John McCain of using "McCarthy-like behavior" in his investigation of convicted GOP lobbyist and Hayworth associate Jack Abramoff.

Hayworth recently sent a letter asking recipients to donate money to support Citizen Outreach and said he is "proud" to have the organization's CEO, Chuck Muth, "on my side."

Muth recently authored a column on the organization's Web site that accused McCain of investigating the Abramoff scandal because the senator believed it "would be an excellent opportunity to settle some old scores," and a way to "scratch the back of a well-heeled lobbyist." Muth condescendingly referred to McCain as "St. John McCain," and wrote that "St. John could almost get away with murder." [Source: http://www.citizenoutreach.com]

"Hayworth's continued involvement in personally attacking Senator McCain and defending Jack Abramoff show he's well out of the mainstream of Arizona voters," said Mitchell campaign spokesperson Seth Scott. "No wonder so many Republicans are supporting Harry Mitchell for Congress."

Hayworth himself took aim at McCain in his book, "Whatever It Takes," calling McCain an "illegal immigration apologist." [Source: "Whatever It Takes," by J.D. Hayworth and Joseph J. Eule, 2006]

Just a few weeks ago, Hayworth was involved in another attack on McCain and refused to denounce remarks questioning McCain's patriotism. The Minuteman Project, which Hayworth has described as a group of "extraordinary Americans," launched a negative ad campaign accusing McCain of leading an effort to "sell out our country." [Source: The Arizona Republic, June 19, 2006; Minuteman Project Web site]

In the same letter in which Hayworth praises Muth, the 12-year incumbent admitted that he is "embarrassed," "ashamed" and "partly responsible" for the nation's border woes because he has "done nothing to secure our borders or to safeguard Americans from any future attacks."

"Mass Deportation"

While it is rare for Espresso Pundit to wade in on the CD-5 race, when he does, I must admit, he always has something interesting to say. Today's post is no different:

If I say it enough, will you believe it's True?

Harry Mitchell's proposal for an "open border" with Mexico is unrealistic
and should be not even be considered in the Congress. An "open border" is
not a solution, it is an abdication of the federal government's fundamental
responsibility to secure our borders. [Source: Associated Press June 26,
2006]

Wow, I didn't know that Harry Mitchell had proposed an "open border."
That's crazy.

Actually, it is crazy because, like, you know, made it up.

But it looks impressive doesn't it? I mean, I have "open border"
in quotes to make it look like I'm actually quoting something. And I have
a source at the end that makes it looks like there is a real place in which
Harry Mitchell proposed an "open border."

It's probably not fair for me to simply make stuff like this up.
But hey, turnabout is fair play.

Check out this tidbit about J.D. Hayworth from Harry Mitchell's
website.

He has also said he would not rule out possibility forcing the "mass
deportation" of 12 million people. [Source: The Arizona Republic, Sept. 1, 2005;
"Whatever It Takes," by J.D. Hayworth and Joseph J. Eule]


Does Hayworth ever use the words "mass deportation?" Of course
not. Harry just made it up. But the source looks really good.
After all, Harry points to the Arizona Republic and Hayworth's own book.
The fact that those sources don't discuss "mass deportation" is beside the
point. At least it's beside the point to Harry.


As evidenced by the first part of his blog, Espresso Pundit clearly demonstrates that words can be twisted in politics to convey different meanings. He concedes it's not fair to make stuff up, and I agree. It's dirty politics to put words in your opponents mouth or to twist things to your advantage.

And then came the surprising part of the post, a clip from a 7/6/06 Mitchell press release. According to Espresso Pundit, it is dirty politics that Harry Mitchell is now playing. Implying that J.D. Hayworth advocated the "mass deportation" of 12 million people when he really has not, is dirty. No doubt about that.

Where I had doubt was when Espresso Pundit said Hayworth never said such a thing, in his book or the Arizona Republic article attributed. I spent about forty minutes in Borders on Mill reading Hayworth's book, while waiting for a band to perform on the second level. No where in the book did I read that Hayworth wanted to deport 12 million people. Then again, I only got about a fifth of the way through it and by that time I was bored and disgusted.

So, I looked up the AZ Republic article in question. And there it was:

Though Hayworth took note of what his constituents thought of mass
deportation and said he wouldn't rule it out,
he imagined public
relations fiasco with images of children being pulled from schools and families from their homes, much like the images of Jewish settlers withdrawing from the Gaza Strip last month.


It clearly states, right there, that Hayworth did not rule out mass deportation. Which is exactly what the Mitchell press release states. The article seems to imply that Hayworth's constituents where what brought mass deportation up. Those were their words and Hayworth took those words and refused to dismiss the idea.

That's what makes Espresso Pundit's post misleading. Those words used by Harry weren't twisted. There was no turnabout.

Monday, July 17, 2006

An Admission of Failure?

Lofty Donkey has the scoop on Mitchell's latest press release.

In a recent letter, Hayworth stated:

"It's outrageous that the nation's leaders have done
nothing
to secure our borders or to safeguard Americans

from any future attacks.

"We no longer control our own borders. Instead they are
controlled by alien and drug smugglers.

"I am embarrassed that I, as a
leader
, am partly responsible...."

(emphasis mine)


Yes, J.D. You should be embarrassed and ashamed. Your empty, offensive rhetoric does nothing to help the debate or foster a real solution for America and for immigrants. In fact, it does the exact opposite, impeding efforts for serious reform. Good to hear we're on the same page.

J.D., Get a Thesaurus

Hayworth's latest press release is amusing for several reasons.

First, J.D. forgets to mention that Mitchell outraised him in this quarter. Okay, no surprise there, but they did like to tout their $400,000 advantage in CoH. Hayworth will be expected to rake in the big bucks, so look for that to be repeated again.

Second, Hayworth points out the more than $50,000 the DCCC has given to Harry. Nice sum of cash from the DCCC, but I think a better number would be the nearly $430K that Harry raised from individual donors. Nearly half a million dollars from individuals in three months. That's amazing and a sign that change may be in the wind.

The third reason ties in with the second: J.D. is still on that DCCC-ad. This press release contains much of the same wording as the last one, hence, my urging him to get a thesaurus. Is that all you got, J.D.? Are we going to have to hear about the ad for another month? If you do insist on doing that, I suggest scrolling down a bit...

Sunday, July 16, 2006

Mitchell Outraises Hayworth in Second Quarter

AZ Congress Watch is reporting that Harry Mitchell raised $561,654.15 in the second quarter over Hayworth's $525,665.50. Hayworth still has more cash on hand and it will only get bigger as the election draws nearer. Mitchell has been getting great support, keep it up everybody! Republicans can be counted on to raise millions, but these numbers show that change is wanted.

Go Harry!

Friday, July 14, 2006

The Politics of Hypocrisy

Last night I was going to blog about Hayworth's press release urging Harry Mitchell to condemn the now-pulled DCCC ad featuring flag-draped coffins come home from Iraq. A classic pot-calling-the-kettle-black story, Mr. Foghorn Leghorn has no business condemning those images. Recall the Bush campaign ads featuring the attacks of 9.11.2001? Or the disgusting display of politics that ended Max Cleland's Senate career? Or how about the 2004 Republican Convention. It was the months of September, October, and November of 2001 condensed in a week. America will never forget, therefore we don't need to re-live it, especially when it is meant to scare us and oppress us into submission.

Personally, I don't like the use of the images of coffins or of the events of 9.11 in political campaign ads, especially fundraising ones. But such times where politics can be played in an ideal way are over. The Republicans have started this, with their Rovian tactics and smear campaigns. And the media eats it and spits it out at the Democratic Party and liberals. They frame the debate so that images of 9.11 are okay to use when you're fighting evil and bringing democracy to the Middle East! But images of flag-draped coffins, or dead brothers and sisters, our dead veterans, is wrong when you're fighting for a change! A change from their mind-numbingly dumb and disasterously dangerous policies.

So today the state GOP dove in after the, as J.D. put it, "deafening silence" from the Mitchell camp. Good for Harry. And shame on the three Democrats mentioned in the GOP press release that demanded the ad be taken down. We are now playing the Republican's game. All the strategy and the tactics that the Beltway has used to take down this game have failed. We can take power if we play by the GOP rules for awhile. Re-take Congress. Restore civilty and cooperation in our national bodies. Work to re-shape our mainstream media. Those are long-term goals and change can only come when we're on top.

If Harry says anything, then it should not be an apology or a condemnation. Harry should remind J.D. why those soldiers are coming home in flag-draped coffins. They are gone because of President Bush and the Republican Congress that blindly and loyally followed. That's you, J.D. You advocate for a policy that preserves the status quo. One where at least one soldier dies a day in Iraq. Civil war in Baghdad. Refugees streaming out of the country. That's what you want and that is not acceptable.

Fight 'em, Harry. Don't give in to this shit.

Thursday, July 13, 2006

Get that man a pair of flip-flops!

On Tuesday, the House passed a bill regulating Internet gambling... because we all know PartyPoker.net is a threat to America. The vote has come along when the GOP is drawing out its base by setting a do-nothing "American Values" agenda in Congress. I say do-nothing because this Congress has literally done nothing. The agenda advanced by the GOP leadership is merely a ploy to fire up the meanest, most vicious, and most reliable part of their base. Sucks for them, though. Weeks have gone by and their attempts to ban gay marriage and flag burning aren't helping. How could it help when Americans are facing an endless war in Iraq and rising energy prices?

It sure as hell shouldn't help J.D. Hayworth. From The Hill: Six years after opposing a similar bill regulating Internet gambling, J.D. flip-flopped.

Republican Reps. Roy Blunt (Mo.), John Doolittle (Calif.) and J.D. Hayworth
(Ariz.) were among the members who voted to support the legislation yesterday
after voting against it in 2000, while Rep. Bob Ney (R-Ohio), whose links to
Abramoff are being investigated by the Justice Department, opposed the bill
yesterday, as he did six years ago.

So, what kind of a difference does six years make?

I would say it has to do with the rise and fall of Jack Abramoff. Several members of Congress, including our own Senator Kyl and Congressman Shadegg, said Abramoff worked to kill the 2000 legislation. He was successful then, but now Abramoff is a federal convict and cooperator.

I don't like to repeat myself too much, but we all must remember that J.D. Hayworth is the single largest receipient of dirty Abramoff money. Hayworth was in the lobbyists' pocket then, but no longer. He wants to distance himself from the scandals and the money.

I guess his take wasn't here this time around...